home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT2163>
- <title>
- Sep. 28, 1992: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Sep. 28, 1992 The Economy
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 46
- Bush as Mr. Scrooge
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Since defeat is an orphan and victory has many fathers, it
- is virtually impossible to discern parentage of a lousy idea.
- Consider George Bush's proposal to cut the salaries of top
- federal employees. In a round of calls, the relevant players
- deny authorship of the President's scheme: The Bush-Quayle
- campaign refers you to the White House, which sends you to the
- Office of Personnel Management, where the buck is passed to the
- President's budget office. No one knows, and no one wants to
- know. Most claim they first learned of this idiocy when they
- watched Bush's domestic policy speech to the Economic Club of
- Detroit two weeks ago. Off the record, there is widespread
- chagrin--and considerable sympathy for those in the
- bureaucracy's upper reaches who have taken to sporting buttons
- that say BUSH HATES ME.
- </p>
- <p> Despite being widely hailed as a first (if late)
- expression of the President's vision for America in the 21st
- century, Bush's Detroit address was little more than a
- gussied-up rehash of old ideas. One of the few new notions was
- his call to slash by 5% the pay of career government workers
- earning more than $75,000 a year. (The White House won't say
- whether the boss would gut his own $200,000 salary.) "Other
- Americans have tightened their belts, and so should the
- better-paid federal workers," Bush told his Detroit audience of
- business heavyweights, whose own belts, of course, couldn't be
- looser.
- </p>
- <p> At first blush, Bush's plan strikes a chord: few who deal
- with the government regularly have a good word for those they
- encounter. On reflection, though, the President's scheme is a
- heartless swipe at a defenseless group of dedicated civil
- servants, designed to capture the knee-jerk support of an
- economically strapped electorate. "It may not be good policy,"
- concedes a Bush adviser, "but it's damn good politics."
- </p>
- <p> "How could it be?" wonders former Federal Reserve Chairman
- Paul Volcker. "It's another complete reversal of a previous
- Bush position." In the late '80s, Volcker's bipartisan
- Commission on the Public Service found the disparity between
- private sector and government compensation so large that many
- key federal jobs were either filled by mediocrities or not
- filled at all. Bush moved quickly to right matters. In his first
- speech after assuming office, the President told a group of
- senior employees that "government service is the highest and
- noblest calling...You work hard, you sacrifice, you deserve
- to be recognized, rewarded and appreciated...I want to make
- sure public service is valued and respected, because I want to
- encourage America's young to pursue careers in government."
- Giving content to his rhetoric, Bush pushed for large salary
- hikes, echoing the Volcker report when he said the "pay gap is
- affecting the Federal Government's ability to attract and retain
- the skilled and motivated senior executives necessary to direct...complex, wide-ranging and critical functions."
- </p>
- <p> Bush's new stance is unfathomably pernicious. It erodes
- morale; it sends a signal to those who might aspire to top
- government positions that their service is barely valued; it
- could cause the quick resignation of the very employees the
- government most needs, since many are eligible for retirement
- right now and their pensions would be adversely affected if they
- stayed; and it would do almost nothing to trim the deficit. If
- passed by Congress, Bush's plan would cut the pay of 45,914
- federal workers. The President could also unilaterally trim the
- salaries of 8,188 Senior Executive Service employees. The net
- savings would be about $270 million, a figure the President
- could easily cover if he expanded what one wag has called
- "George Bush's Going out of Business Sale" by offering the
- Saudis just four more $70 million F-15s--which, needless to
- say, the kingdom would gladly buy.
- </p>
- <p> If the President is serious, his scheme is wrongheaded for
- another reason: it undercuts his professed desire to
- "right-size" government. Immediately after proposing the pay
- cut, Bush called for "a streamlined reorganization of the
- Executive Branch through a consolidation of agencies and bureaus
- that will enable us to do our job better." He struck at the
- right culprit--the bloated bureaucracy--but his method is
- madness. "As Presidents have sought control of the governments
- they oversee, they have added increasingly redundant layers of
- middle managers at the expense of those who do the real work,"
- says Paul Light, a public affairs professor at the University
- of Minnesota. "In government the classic organizational pyramid
- has become a pentagon, and it's moving toward becoming a
- diamond. The place to cut is in the middle, and if you do that
- you need even better-skilled and therefore better-paid senior
- managers to make sure the business gets done."
- </p>
- <p> Campaigns routinely spawn impossible promises and
- nonsensical ideas, and no matter how cynical you are, it's hard
- to keep up. The best that can be hoped for Bush's pay-cut plan
- is that the President doesn't intend it to be taken seriously,
- and that if he is re-elected it will be forgotten. In the
- meantime, the scheme should be seen as one more reason why so
- many doubt that Bush deserves a second term.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-